Lesson 22: Ezekiel 40-43:12
1. Introduction
A. Chapter 40 begins a puzzling section in the book of
Ezekiel. After all that we have seen, one would not at this
point expect an architectural blueprint -- and yet that is
exactly what we get in these chapters. What is God trying
to tell us?
B. Before we launch into an explanation of what God is (and
is not!) trying to tell us, it will be helpful to keep in
mind two primary themes from these chapters:
1. The truth that is now being trampled underfoot by the
heathen will one day be vindicated.
2. In connection with all of the blessings that were
promised in chapters 34-39, a holiness will be demanded of
Israel that it has not previously known.
C. These themes will help us date the fulfillment of this
prophecy.
1. Do these chapters describe something yet to be, or have
these prophecies been fulfilled? And if so, where exactly
is this temple?
2. Has the truth been vindicated, or is that yet to come?
Has this new level of holiness come about, or is that yet
to be? Jumping ahead to chapter 43, has God returned to his
holy temple, or is that yet to be?
2. Literal or Figurative
A. The timing issue can be considered in terms of another
issue -- does the prophecy in these chapters contemplate a
literal fulfillment or a figurative fulfillment?
B. If literal, then the timing issue is answered because
the temple described in these chapters has NEVER been
constructed. If it is to be literally constructed in
Palestine (as some suggest) then these chapters MUST point
to some still future time.
C. If we are to take these prophecies of Ezekiel literally,
then here is a list of what will one day occur:
1. The nation of Israel will be restored by God in the land
of Palestine.
2. The nation of Israel will be ruled over by only one king
-- King David.
a) I said in an earlier lesson that even the most rabid
premillennialists took the reference to David here to be a
reference to Christ. I was mistaken. Walvoord takes the
reference literally. He says that David will be resurrected
during the Millennium to share with Christ as prince some
of the governmental duties of the millennial kingdom.
b) Yet is that what the text says (even literally)? No.
(Ezekiel 34:23) "And I will set up one shepherd over them,
and he shall feed them, even my servant David; he shall
feed them, and he shall be their shepherd." One shepherd --
not co-shepherds.
3. The nation of Israel will dwell on this earth for
eternity.
4. A temple will be built on this earth and God will dwell
there for eternity.
5. The land promise to Israel will NOT be fulfilled even in
the millennium.
a) Why? Because the boundaries given later in 47:13-23 do
not include all of the land mentioned in Genesis 15:18-21
and Exodus 23:28-31.
b) The literalists teach that God's promise of land to the
Jews was never fulfilled as to either duration or area.
They teach that the area described in Genesis 15:18-21 was
never given to them, and they have so far never received
any land as an everlasting possession.
c) This view is contradicted by Joshua 21:43-45 as to area
and by Deut. 28:58-63 as to duration.
(1) Joshua 21:43-45 (And the LORD gave unto Israel all the
land which he sware to give unto their fathers; and they
possessed it, and dwelt therein. ... There failed not ought
of any good thing which the LORD had spoken unto the house
of Israel; all came to pass.)
(2) Deuteronomy 28:58-63 (If thou wilt not observe to do
all the words of this law that are written in this book,
... ye shall be plucked from off the land whither thou
goest to possess it.)
6. The Levitical priesthood is to be restored forever with
the Zadokites officiating.
a) As you recall, Zadok and Abiathar acted as high priests
together for a time, but when Adonijah tried to grab the
throne, Abiathar went with him, and therefore Solomon
"thrust him out from being high priest," and Zadok,
remaining faithful to David, became high priest alone.
7. Animal sacrifices as an atonement for sin will be
eternally restored.
8. Circumcision is to be restored as essential to communion
with God in worship.
D. Before we deal with the not-so-obvious difficulties of a
literal interpretation, let's say a few words about the
obvious difficulties with these views.
1. Doesn't the book of Hebrews plainly oppose the idea of a
resurrected Aaronic priesthood in 7:11-28? Doesn't it also
reject the return of animal sacrifices in 10:17-18?
2. Also, do you remember what Paul had to say to those who
wanted to reimpose circumcision as essential to communion
with God? (Galatians 5:12) "As for those agitators, I wish
they would go the whole way and emasculate themselves!"
(NIV)
a) I wonder what Paul would have to say to those today who
teach that circumcision will be a requirement in the
millennial dispensation? I think we know exactly what he
would say!
b) Paul taught that declaring circumcision is essential to
communion with God bound the whole law on the people.
(Galatians 5) To bind the Mosaic law on people is to bring
them under a curse. (Galatians 3:10, 13)
c) "Grace and law are not dispensational issues -- they are
eternal. Men are not saved by the works of law in any age."
d) It is interesting that the same denominations who
complain that baptism is a work are perfectly willing to
bind the entire Law of Moses on people in the next
dispensation.
3. What about the restoration of the Aaronic priesthood?
a) Hebrews 7:11-12 tells us that the priesthood of Aaron is
inseparably connected to the Mosaic law. To have one means
that we must have the other.
b) Under the millennial theories, the Jews in the
millennium will be under two laws at the same time. Yet
Paul in Romans 7 declared that to be spiritual adultery.
4. How do the literalists respond to this?
a) Some suppose that the animal sacrifices are merely
memorials similar presumably to the Lord's Supper. But the
text itself contradicts this view -- it says these animal
sacrifices are to make atonement for sin.
b) Some suggest that the book of Hebrews (and much of the
rest of the New Testament) is true for the "Church Age" but
not true for the Millennium. Yet doesn't Hebrews say that
Christ's sacrifice was "once for all"?
(1) Also, what about the Jews in the early church who
thought they had to practice both systems at the same time?
Were they told that the difference was between the church
age and the millennial age? No. They were told that the
difference was between law and grace.
c) Some tell us that the two sacrificial systems and the
two priesthoods will coexist, yet isn't the whole point of
Hebrews that the two systems cannot coexist? And what does
that tell us about Christ's sacrifice if we need another
one to go along with it?
E. Hermeneutics -- The Science of Interpretation
1. Hermeneutics is the process by which one interprets the
Bible.
a) You may have heard about the "New Hermeneutics," which
generally describes a system promoted by some in which the
reader (rather than the writer) is the source of truth. We
are going to look at a different hermeneutical controversy
here.
2. The hermeneutical principle at issue here is whether
these chapters in Ezekiel convey truth in literal terms or
in figurative terms.
3. It is undeniable that the Scripture sometimes conveys
truth in figurative terms.
a) Sometimes the figures are obvious. ("a shoot out of the
root of Jesse")
b) Sometimes the figures are not obvious, but they are
clearly explained.
(1) (Malachi 4:5) "Behold, I will send you Elijah the
prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of
the LORD."
(2) (Matthew 17:10-13) 10 And His disciples asked Him,
saying, "Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come
first?" 11 Jesus answered and said to them, "Indeed, Elijah
is coming first and will restore all things. 12 "But I say
to you that Elijah has come already, and they did not know
him but did to him whatever they wished. Likewise the Son
of Man is also about to suffer at their hands." 13 Then the
disciples understood that He spoke to them of John the
Baptist.
4. The general rule is that language in the Bible should be
taken literally unless:
a) It would result in an absurd conclusion.
(1) (Luke 13:31-32) The same day there came certain of the
Pharisees, saying unto him, Get thee out, and depart hence:
for Herod will kill thee. 32 And he said unto them, Go ye,
and tell that fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do
cures to day and to morrow, and the third day I shall be
perfected.
b) It would promote immoral or insane behavior.
(1) Luke 14:26 If any man come to me, and hate not his
father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren,
and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my
disciple.
(2) Matthew 5:29 And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it
out, and cast it from thee:
c) It would contradict an interpretation given elsewhere in
the Bible.
(1) Recall the example given above about Elijah and John
the Baptist.
d) It would contradict clearly taught Bible doctrines.
(1) Hebrews tells us that the days of animal sacrifices are
over now that the perfect sacrifice has been made by Jesus
Christ once for all. Thus, Ezekiel cannot properly be
interpreted to teach that animal sacrifices for atonement
of sin will one day be restored.
e) It would cause the Bible to be guilty of scientific or
historical error.
(1) We have to be careful with that one since -- unlike the
Bible -- science and history have a way of changing on us.
We must never interpret scripture simply out of a desire to
make peace with secular scientists and historians -- yet
neither can we ignore the evidence of history and science.
Truth is truth, and if properly interpreted the Bible will
be in perfect agreement with all scientific truth and all
historical truth.
(2) Scientists used to laugh at Bible believers who
believed that the universe had a beginning. Now there is
not a scientist alive who doesn't believe that the universe
had a beginning. (The only disagreement now is over the
timing and cause of that beginning.)
5. Here are some examples in which God uses speech that
could be interpreted literally, but which cannot without
violating the above rules.
a) In Hosea 7:16, 8:13, and 9:3, God said that the northern
kingdom would go into Egyptian captivity. Egypt was used as
a figure for Assyria.
b) In Micah 5:5 God speaks of Jesus delivering his people
from Assyria. Assyria was used as a figure for any enemy
who attacks God's people.
c) In Ezekiel 16:53-59, God says that Samaria and Sodom
will be restored, yet Jude 7 tells us that Sodom will never
rise again.
d) In Isaiah 19:18-25, God says that Egypt and Assyria will
be his people, with Israel falling into third place. God
was telling Israel that one day these great enemies would
acknowledge Him and no longer be a threat to Israel.
6. Why does God use figurative language?
a) It may be used to hide messages from those who aren't
really interested in God or who would react violently to
the message.
(1) (Matthew 13:10-11) "And the disciples came, and said
unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He
answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you
to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them
it is not given."
(2) John had a message for Rome in the book of Revelation,
but that message was written in symbols drawn largely from
the Jewish Old Testament. So if you were a first century
you could understand the message, but if you were a Roman
it would all be Greek!
b) It may be used to describe a future judgment or blessing
in terms of a past judgment or blessing.
(1) Jewish prosperity under the Messiah is described in
terms of Jewish prosperity in former days.
(2) The judgment of Rome in the book of Revelation is
described in terms of God's judgments against Assyria and
Babylon.
(3) The use of past events to describe future events is
common in the Bible. There are two important principles in
interpreting such figurative sections of the Bible.
(a) Similarity of symbol does not necessarily imply
similarity of subject. That is, the same symbol may be used
to describes two different subjects.
(b) Dissimilarity of symbol does not necessarily imply
dissimilarity of subject. That is, different symbols may be
used to describe the same subject.
(4) Failure to understand these principles can lead to big
problems. Every time I have taught Revelation I have been
approached by people who are from or who know people who
are from churches that have been divided over a false
doctrine called "Max Kingism" or the "70 AD Theory" or
"realized eschatology." In short, that false doctrine is
that ALL of the prophecies in the Bible (including the
"second coming" of Christ, the final judgment, and the
bodily resurrection of the dead!) were all fulfilled by the
destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD.
(5) The nonsense taught by Max King and his followers all
traces back to their failure to understand that God often
uses the same language and symbols to describe different
judgments. (Israel, Judah, Assyria, Babylon, Tyre, Egypt,
Jerusalem, Rome, World)
(6) Some immediate problems with Max Kingism are:
(a) 1 Corinthians 11:26 "For as often as ye eat this bread,
and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he
come." (Max Kingites continue to observe the Lord's Supper.
I wonder why if the Lord has already come again.)
(b) Matthew 22:30 "For in the resurrection they neither
marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of
God in heaven." (The Kingites for some reason continue to
get married even though this verse suggests they should be
like the angels now that the resurrection is past.)
(7) 2 Timothy 2:16-18 "But shun profane and vain babblings:
for they will increase unto more ungodliness. 17 And their
word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and
Philetus; 18 Who concerning the truth have erred, saying
that the resurrection is past already; and overthrow the
faith of some."
(a) In the first century there were some who said the
resurrection was past, and their false doctrine overthrew
the faith of some. Max King is teaching the same false
doctrine today. Paul said such teaching was a "profane and
vain babbling" -- it hasn't improved in the intervening
2000 years!
c) Returning to our discussion of why God uses figurative
language, another reason is that it may be used because the
readers have a slowness in spiritual perception or an
immaturity in their spiritual lives that makes it difficult
to grasp some truths.
(1) Isaiah 11:6-10 speaks of peace and prosperity in
physical terms, yet Paul applies the passage to the joys
shared by Jew and Gentile alike in Christ in Romans
15:8,12.
(2) In Ezekiel 16:3, 45, God told Judah that her ancestors
were the Caananites, Hittites, and Amorites. God used tough
language to break Judah out of its stupor.
d) Sometimes figures are used because the vivid language
causes the lesson to be remembered longer.
(1) Jesus' parables fall into this category.
(2) See also Genesis 49:11 ("he washed his garments in
wine") The people would be so prosperous they would wash
their clothes in wine rather than in water.
(3) Jerusalem's judgment in Matthew 24 is described as the
sun being darkened, the moon not giving her light, the
stars falling from heaven, and the powers of the heavens
being shaken.
F. If we then take these chapters in Ezekiel to be
figurative, what do they represent? There are at least two
views:
1. Ezekiel is giving us an allegory in which David
represents Christ, the Temple represents the church, the
Priests represent Christians, etc.
2. Ezekiel is painting a beautiful picture of glory and
blessings for the Jews under their coming Messiah, without
intending each specific detail to be allegorical. Under
this second view, the details are brush strokes. The
message is in the overall picture.
3. A good case can be made for either of these figurative
interpretations, but as discussed above the literal
interpretation must be rejected.
3. The Return of God to His Temple (43:1-5)
A. We are going to jump ahead and study the first twelve
verses of Chapter 43 before we look at Chapters 40-42. Why?
Because in Chapter 43 God tells us why he goes into such
detail in Chapters 40-42. He tells us what the vision
means.
B. In Chapter 8, Ezekiel in a vision saw the glory of God
depart from the temple in Jerusalem. (8:6)
1. Ezekiel expressly tells us here in Chapter 43 that this
vision is like the one he had back in Chapter 8.
C. Here in 43:1-5, Ezekiel sees God return to his temple
--- BUT THINGS ARE GOING TO HAVE TO BE DIFFERENT THAN THEY
WERE BEFORE! THE PEOPLE WILL HAVE TO BE DIFFERENT ... AND
THAT (AS VERSES 6-12 WILL TELL US) IS THE WHOLE POINT OF
THE VISION IN CHAPTERS 40-42.
D. God did not have some future millennial kingdom in mind
--- indeed, he nowhere mentions a 1000 reign of Christ. (In
fact, neither does Revelation! Revelation 20:6 speaks of a
1000 reign with Christ. The reign of Christ is not some
future event that we are looking forward to. Christ is
reigning now!)
1. Revelation 20:6 ("and shall reign with him a thousand
years") -- Those 8 words are the basis on which the entire
premillennial theory is built.
4. The Dedication of the Temple (43:6-12)
A. Solomon made a dedication speech at the opening of the
first temple, and God makes a dedication speech at the
opening of this temple.
B. God tells Ezekiel that this sanctuary is where he will
abide forever. (verse 7)
1. If we want to know where this temple was (or is) going
to be constructed, we can work at the problem backwards by
asking where God is going to abide forever.
2. In Exodus 25:8 God said "Let them make me a sanctuary,
that I may dwell among them." In many ways the rest of the
Bible is simply a variation on that theme.
3. John 1:14 tells us that "the word became flesh and dwelt
among us." A literal translation of this passage is that
the word became flesh and tabernacled among us.
4. In Revelation 21:3 (speaking of the triumphant church
after the judgment of Rome) God says "Behold, the
tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them,
and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with
them, and be their God."
5. 1 Corinthians 3:16 ("Know ye not that ye are the temple
of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?")
6. Paul (describing the church) writes in Ephesians 2:22
("in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling
of God in the Spirit.")
7. We as Christians are looking forward to many blessings
-- but God dwelling among us is not one of them! That is
already true in the church! We are the dwelling of God in
the Spirit!
C. The temple is constructed so that there is complete
separation between God and his servants. (verses 7-8, 12)
1. Separation stresses the holiness of that which is
separated.
a) (Ezekiel 42:20) "to make a separation between the
sanctuary and the profane place."
b) (Revelation 11:1-2) "And there was given me a reed like
unto a rod: and the angel stood, saying, Rise, and measure
the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship
therein. 2 But the court which is without the temple leave
out, and measure it not; for it is given unto the Gentiles:
and the holy city shall they tread under foot forty and two
months."
c) The detailed measurements in these chapters stress this
separation and this holiness.
2. "Some may rule in pomp and splendor, but God rules from
a place of maximum holiness because that befits his
character."
3. The people here are being called to a standard of
holiness that they had never before practiced. The very
structure of this temple is calling them to holiness.
4. Chapters 40-42 will show this holiness in terms of
separation, with the holy of holies being the most
separated area of all.
5. And what is the significance of the Holy of Holies to a
Christian?
a) (Hebrews 9:7-8) "But into the second went the high
priest alone once every year, not without blood, which he
offered for himself, and for the errors of the people: 8
The Holy Ghost this signifying, that the way into the
holiest of all was not yet made manifest, while as the
first tabernacle was yet standing."
b) (Hebrews 9:11-12) "But Christ being come an high priest
of good things to come, by a greater and more perfect
tabernacle, not made with hands, that is to say, not of
this building; 12 Neither by the blood of goats and calves,
but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy
place, having obtained eternal redemption for us."
c) (Hebrews 9:24) "For Christ is not entered into the holy
places made with hands, which are the figures of the true;
but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of
God for us."
(1) Jesus Christ entered the Holy of Holies on our behalf
--- but NOT a Holy of Holies on earth. Jesus entered God's
presence in Heaven. Why in the world would anyone think
that God would construct another earthly Holy of Holies in
a dusty building somewhere in the middle of Palestine?
Hebrews 9:24 expressly tells us that the true Holy of
Holies into which Christ entered was not made with human
hands.
d) (Hebrews 4:16) "Let us therefore come boldly unto the
throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace
to help in time of need."
D. Verses 10-12 tell us why God provides the blueprint in
Chapters 40-42.
1. God gave them this blueprint so that they would be
ashamed. He urges them to "measure the pattern" so that
they may be ashamed.
2. THE DETAILS IN CHAPTERS 40-42 WERE INTENDED TO TEACH THE
PEOPLE A LESSON ABOUT THEIR UNGODLINESS.
3. This temple is intended to teach a lesson about the
wickedness of Israel. They had never really been holy, and
this temple and its regulations were a call to holiness.
4. A primary theme in Chapters 40-42 is measurement. The
word "measure" is used 48 times in those three chapters!
What does it mean?
5. Revelation 11:1-2 gives us a clue. In those verses John
was told to measure something but NOT to measure something
else. What was he told NOT to measure? The area being
trampled by the Gentiles -- that is, the area that was not
holy. To measure something is to set it off as separate and
holy.
6. Holiness is the message of Chapters 40-46. Yet isn't
that a simple message for such a long section of the book?
Why spend seven chapters on that one topic? Surely God
would not have gone in to all of this detail just to
deliver a message on holiness. Right? Wrong! Holiness is
how we gain access to God! We should be surprised he spent
only seven chapters on that topic!
5. The Temple: Its Structure and Measurements (40-42)
A. Now that we know why God gave us such a detailed
blueprint, let's take a look at the details in Chapters
40-42.
B. Before we begin, we need to look at some small issues
over which there have been big disagreements:
1. There is disagreement as to the size of the cubit that
Ezekiel used. The most popular choices are 18 inches, 21
inches, and 24 inches. If we take the 21 inch value, then a
"rod" (which is 6 cubits) would be 10.5 feet. (McGuiggan
uses the 21 inch value.)
2. There are some textual variations in these chapters
between the Massoretic text and the Septuagint in that in a
few places the former has "rods" where the latter has
"cubits." If you stick with the Massoretic, then the temple
seemingly becomes much too big. Most commentators go with
the "cubit" text for that reason, but it is only a problem
if you think God has a literal building in mind here.
3. Ezekiel neglects to give us a few of the details. For
example, he says nothing about the height of the temple. He
also does not tell us very much about the 30 chambers in
the outer court (40:17). Commentators have arranged them in
various configurations.
C. This vision is dated in the 25th year of exile and the
14th year after the fall of Jerusalem. This would be around
573 BC.
D. Everyone agrees that the angel takes Ezekiel in through
the east gate, so we will begin there as well.
E. Ezekiel sees a city-like structure standing on the
southern slope of a high mountain. A wall runs around the
building, which is a square with sides of 875 feet. (We are
using a 21 inch cubit.) The wall is 10.5 feet high and 10.5
feet thick.
F. There are three gates in the wall on the north, south,
and east sides. You climb up 7 steps to enter the east
gate. The entrance to the east gateway is 17.5 feet wide.
Inside are six guardrooms with a porch at the end of the
corridor. Moving west out of the porch, you enter the outer
court.
G. Around the north, south, and east walls are 30 chambers,
which may be living quarters for the temple workers. In the
four corners are kitchens where the sacrifices are
prepared.
H. From the outer east gate we now walk northwest to the
inner north gate. There are rooms for those who help get
the sacrifices ready and rooms for the singers or priests
who officiate at the altar. There are washing chambers for
washing and readying the sacrifices for slaughter. There
are tables set up near the washing chambers.
I. We walk up 8 steps to this north gate and enter the
inner court. We are now in the inner court standing by the
north gate. The inner court is a square with 100 cubits for
each side. In the center of the inner court is the altar of
burnt offering.
J. Moving west we come to a set of 10 steps that lead up to
the temple sanctuary itself with the holy place and the
holy of holies. The wall that encloses the temple sanctuary
is six cubits thick. Outside that wall on the north, west,
and south are another set of 30 chambers.
K. The holy place is 40 cubits long by 20 wide and contains
an altar-like table. It may be the table of shewbread or
the incense altar. There are double doors leading into the
holy of holies.
L. The holy of holies was a square 20 cubits by 20 cubits.
The entrance into the holy of holies is 10.5 wide. (The
entry into the holy place is 17.5 wide, and the entry into
the temple sanctuary is 24.5 wide. The gates get narrower
as the rooms get holier.) There is nothing mentioned as
being in the holy of holies.
M. Around the temple sanctuary are buildings providing
living quarters for priests and another building whose
purpose is not revealed (perhaps for storage). There are
additional kitchens near these buildings.
N. Each of the structures that we have just discussed is
shown on the handout, although some of the locations shown
are matters of opinion since the text does not provide a
precise location.
O. Now we have a decision to make. Are these chapters
describing a literal temple or a figurative temple?
1. If the temple is literal, then this prophecy has not
been fulfilled because this temple has never been built.
Thus, if the temple is literal, then someday God will cause
this great temple to be constructed in Palestine and Jesus
and/or David will go there to reign.
2. What are the consequences of this view?
a) First, this view requires us to believe that God still
has some special plan for the Jews despite the clear
teachings that there is no longer any distinction between
Jew and Gentile.
b) Second, this view requires us to believe that Jesus will
set up an earthly kingdom despite:
(1) (John 18:36) "My kingdom is not of this world: if my
kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight,
that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my
kingdom not from hence."
(2) (Mark 9:1) "And he said unto them, Verily I say unto
you, That there be some of them that stand here, which
shall not taste of death, till they have seen the kingdom
of God come with power."
(3) (1 Corinthians 15:24) "Then cometh the end, when he
shall have delivered up the kingdom to God, even the
Father; when he shall have put down all rule and all
authority and power."
c) Third, this view requires us to believe that Christ's
once for all sacrifice was not enough to fulfill God's
promises to Israel. God owes them even more!
6. Back to Chapter 43
A. As we discussed, the first 12 verses of Chapter 43 tell
us why God went into such detail in Chapters 40-42. He was
calling the people to holiness. Indeed, he was calling them
to a standard of holiness that they had never before
obtained.
1. (Ezekiel 43:10) "Son of man, describe the temple to the
house of Israel, that they may be ashamed of their
iniquities; and let them measure the pattern. 11 "And if
they are ashamed of all that they have done, make known to
them the design of the temple and its arrangement, its
exits and its entrances, its entire design and all its
ordinances, all its forms and all its laws. Write it down
in their sight, so that they may keep its whole design and
all its ordinances, and perform them. 12 "This is the law
of the temple: The whole area surrounding the mountaintop
is most holy. Behold, this is the law of the temple."
B. Lessons for Today
1. Holiness is not optional! It is called the Law of the
Temple in Ezekiel 43. The following verses summarize the
message of Ezekiel 40-42 in a nutshell.
a) (1 Peter 1:15-16) "But as he which hath called you is
holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation;
16Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy."
b) (2 Corinthians 6:17) "Wherefore come out from among
them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the
unclean thing; and I will receive you."
c) (1 Peter 2:9) "But ye are a chosen generation, a royal
priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye
should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you
out of darkness into his marvellous light."
2. God provides a pattern for his people to follow.
a) (Ezekiel 43:11) "shew them the form of the house, and
the fashion thereof, and the goings out thereof, and the
comings in thereof, and all the forms thereof, and all the
ordinances thereof, and all the forms thereof, and all the
laws thereof: and write it in their sight, that they may
keep the whole form thereof, and all the ordinances
thereof, and do them."
b) (Hebrews 8:5) "Who serve unto the example and shadow of
heavenly things, as Moses was admonished of God when he was
about to make the tabernacle: for, See, saith he, that thou
make all things according to the pattern shewed to thee in
the mount."
c) (2 Timothy 1:13) "Hold fast the pattern of sound words
which you have heard from me, in faith and love which are
in Christ Jesus."
d) If in fact this temple is an allegory for the church,
then one would be hard pressed to argue that God does not
want us to follow a pattern for proper worship in the
church. God has given us a blueprint in the New Testament
that he expects us to follow.